The Remember Me feature is an automatic login process which creates a cookie on the hard drive of your computer containing a unique identifier which ASCO.org will utilize to remember you by, thereby avoiding the need to enter username and password upon subsequent visits to ASCO.org. DO NOT select this option if you share this computer with others since transactional, personal, or member only information will be accessible by other users.

To activate the Remember Me option, click the empty check box when signing in to the site. The Remember Me functionality is deactivated at the logout.

For additional information please review our Privacy Policy.

Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC: A phase III study.

Print

Sub-category:
Metastatic Lung Cancer

Category:
Lung Cancer--Metastatic Lung Cancer

Meeting:
2008 ASCO Annual Meeting

Abstract No:
8011

Citation:
J Clin Oncol 26: 2008 (May 20 suppl; abstr 8011)

Author(s):
T. E. Ciuleanu, T. Brodowicz, C. P. Belani, J. Kim, M. Krzakowski, E. Laack, Y. Wu, P. Peterson, S. Adachi, C. C. Zielinski

Abstract:

Background: This multicenter phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed (Pem) versus placebo (Plac) in pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy. Per protocol, final analyses were completed for all outcomes except overall survival (OS). Sub-group analyses were based on results from prior studies. Methods: In this double-blind trial, pts were randomized (2:1 ratio; balanced for stage, ECOG PS, sex, response to induction therapy, non-platinum component of induction therapy, and brain metastases) to receive Pem (500 mg/m2, day 1) plus BSC or Plac plus BSC in 21-day cycles until disease progression. All pts received vitamin B12, folic acid and dexamethasone. The primary analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) was based on an unadjusted Cox HR (target n=660; alpha=0.05; power=85% to show HR<1.00 assuming 462 events and HR=0.75). Results: A total of 663 pts were enrolled (Pem=441; Plac=222). Pt characteristics were well balanced between arms: median age=61 years; 27% female; 39% PS 0, 60% PS 1; 19% Stage IIIB; 23% East Asian; 50% adenocarcinoma, 27% squamous cell, 3% large cell, and 20% other/indeterminate histology; 49% induction CR/PR; and 8% with brain metastases. Pem had better efficacy with respect to PFS (4.3 vs 2.6 mos [HR 0.502, 95% CI: 0.42-0.61, p <0.00001]) and tumor response (p <0.001), especially in non-squamous pts. With 55% censoring (all pts), preliminary OS was 13.0 mos with Pem and 10.2 mos with Plac (HR 0.798, 95% CI 0.63-1.01, p = 0.060). There were no significant toxicity differences between arms except for grade 3-4 anemia (Pem 4.5%, Plac 1.4%) and total SAEs due to drug (Pem 4.3%, Plac 0%). Conclusions: Post-induction maintenance therapy with Pem is well tolerated and offers superior PFS compared with Plac in pts with advanced NSCLC. This trial confirms that Pem has greater efficacy in patients with non-squamous histology.

Median PFS (mos)HR
p-value
Objective Tumor Response
(CR+PR+SD)
p-value
PemPlaceboPemPlacebo
All patients4.32.60.502 <0.0000151.733.3<0.001
Non-squamous (n=482)4.52.60.444 <0.0000157.732.7<0.001
Adenocarcinoma (n=329)4.72.60.452 <0.0000161.033.0<0.001
Large Cell (n=20)3.52.10.400 0.10945.533.30.670
Other (n=133)4.22.80.433 0.000251.131.70.041
Squamous (n=181)2.82.60.692 0.03934.834.81.000


Abstract Disclosures

Abstracts that were granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Conflict of Interest Policy and are designated with a caret symbol (^) here and in the print version.


  Associated Presentation(s):

    

1. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC: A phase III study

Meeting: 2008 Best of ASCO Boston
Speaker: T. Ciuleanu
Session: General Session XIII: Lung Cancer - Non-Small Cell Carcinoma

    

2. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC: A phase III study.

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting
Presenter: Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, MD
Session: Lung Cancer — Metastatic (Oral Presentation)


  Other Abstracts in this Sub-Category:

    

1. FLEX: A randomized, multicenter, phase III study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin/vinorelbine (CV) versus CV alone in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting   Abstract No: 3   First Author: R. Pirker
Category: Lung Cancer--Metastatic Lung Cancer - Metastatic Lung Cancer

    

2. Characterization of NSCLC patients responding to anti-IGF-IR therapy.

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting   Abstract No: 8000   First Author: A. Gualberto
Category: Lung Cancer--Metastatic Lung Cancer - Metastatic Lung Cancer

    

3. Molecular and clinical subgroup analyses from a phase III trial comparing gefitinib with docetaxel in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (INTEREST).

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting   Abstract No: 8001^   First Author: J. Douillard
Category: Lung Cancer--Metastatic Lung Cancer - Metastatic Lung Cancer

    

More...


  Abstracts by T. E. Ciuleanu :

    

1. Correlation of KRAS status with clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated first-line with FOLFOX6 + cetuximab (FX+C) or FOLFIRI + cetuximab (FF+C): The CECOG/CORE1.2.001 trial.

Meeting: 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting   Abstract No: 4055   First Author: I. Koza
Category: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer - Colorectal Cancer (including liver metastases)

    

2. Time interval between final protocol approval (FPA) and inclusion of the first patient into randomized clinical trials (RCTs) performed by the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG): A 10-year experience.

Meeting: 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting   Abstract No: 6546   First Author: T. Brodowicz
Category: Health Services Research

    

3. A randomized, open-label CECOG phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX6 + cetuximab versus FOLFIRI + cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting   Abstract No: 4032   First Author: T. E. Ciuleanu
Category: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer - Colorectal Cancer (including liver metastases)

    

More...


  Presentations by T. E. Ciuleanu :

    

1. A randomized, open-label CECOG phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX6 + cetuximab versus FOLFIRI + cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting
Presenter: Tudor E Ciuleanu, MD
Session: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer (Poster Discussion)

    

2. Proceedings I Press Briefing

Meeting: 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting
Participant: Tudor E Ciuleanu, MD
Session: Proceedings I Press Briefing (Press Program)

    

3. A randomized, open-label phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX6 + cetuximab versus FOLFIRI + cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Meeting: 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
Presenter: Tudor E Ciuleanu, MD
Session: General Poster Session D (Poster Presentation)

    

More...


  Educational Book Manuscripts by T. E. Ciuleanu :

    

No items found.




 
2318 Mill Road, Suite 800, Alexandria, VA 22314   |   phone: (571) 483-1300
© 2005-2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).  All rights reserved worldwide.